active x controls

1 (1) |
3 (1) |
3 (1) |
3 (1) |
3 (1) |
4 (1) |
4 (1) |
4 (1) |
6 (1) |
8 (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
A (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |
a (1) |

Vista functionality still wins over security

By secgeeks - Posted on August 8th, 2008

Tagged:

193

A researcher renowned for tinkering with Active X controls tossed a pail of ice water today at Black Hat on the security-first marketing associated with Vista.

Vista functionality still wins over security

By secgeeks - Posted on August 7th, 2008

Tagged:

165

vote

A researcher renowned for tinkering with Active X controls tossed a pail of ice water today at Black Hat on the security-first marketing associated with Vista.Su Yong Kim demonstrated how developers often install program files or store sensitive data in low integrity folders in order to simplify updates. Problem is, these folders don’t require user [...] read more »